Mystic Syd Predicts all I never thought I would miss Rosicky


By Boris Mellor
April 14 2013

In the greasy spoon before the match, Syd the Cabbie and me discussed our predictions, over Chicken Shish for a change. I thought it was time we had a clean sheet again so went for 3-0, whilst Syd looked into his crystal ball, he saw lots of sideways passing as the team struggled to score. It will be level at half time, and Arsenal will not score a goal until final ten minutes and will eventually win he soothsaid.

I should have paid more attention, because Syd won £120 on his soothsaying, but it didn’t save me from the anxiety of watching a mostly toothless performance for 80 minutes.

If the BBC are to be believed Arsenal had only two more shots on target than Norwich in the whole game, although most of the Canaries shots came after the Gunners equaliser, there again so did the home team’s. The BBC also claims Norwich had more possession.  True or not there certainly was a lot of crab football, plus if the time wasting by the Norwich keeper counts as possession then they waltzed it. There was 6 minutes added time at the end of the game, and there is nothing more likely to infuriate the Gooner faithful than time wasting.

Missing Rosicky

Arsenal had started brightly enough with a Wilshere pass almost reaching Ramsey for an early strike, but after that the Gunners became more circumspect, losing tempo and directness. Wilshere, understandably,  lacked fitness and sharpness. Norwich defended deep and in numbers and Arsenal struggled to produce many effective strikes at goal. Arsenal were clearly missing Rosicky’s directness, and even, I never thought I would say this, his effectiveness in the box. So it was hardly a surprise that at the end of the first half it was 0-0.

If the first half had been poor, worse was yet to come and on 56 minutes Norwich, who had hardly attacked all game, went ahead after conning a free kick. My 3-0 prediction went down the plughole with yet another example of poor Arsenal defending.

Norwich then parked the bus, and also used some dubious tactics including time wasting, none of which seemed to bother the referee that much. The crowd kept behind the team, and the bringing on of Walcott and Podolski finally made Arsenal’s play more direct. On 85 minutes after a contested corner for Arsenal the ball seemed to have been cleared but the linesman was signalling the ref. There is nothing like actually  being at a football match for not knowing what is happening, but apparently a penalty was being awarded by the linesman. From 27 rows high in the North Bank we could not work out why, but it was welcome nonetheless.

All Praise Arteta

Norwich did everything they could to put the Spaniard off, including barging into him as he waited for their keeper to leave the D and go back into his goal. It was a disgraceful show of poor sportsmanship, I can just imagine the pontificating on MOTD if the Arsenal had behaved that way. It might not have been Arteta’s greatest penalty ever, but it was enough to put Arsenal back into a game they had increasingly looked like losing.

Suddenly the Canary keeper was keen to get the ball back into the game, oh how the crowd enjoyed the irony of that. Cheering his every move, as Norwich finally discovered some ambition. On 88 minutes Giroud tangled up with a defender and  scraped the ball into the net, well apparently it was him, but it was a bit of a scramble. The crowd celebrated as if Arsenal had won a trophy.

On 90 minutes the 4th official's LED board went up announcing 6 minutes added time, there was a slight groan, too long to play corner pin, and not long enough to recover if there were any slip ups. Fortunately Podolski was prepared to risk Wenger’s wrath by shooting from outside the box on 90 minutes. Good and true it sailed past the keeper, “he scores when he wants” crowed the crowd knowing at 3-1 it was game over. Why doesn’t Wenger use him more often?

With Walcott, Giroud and Podolski all playing up front Arsenal had finally looked a threat, but it had taken a Norwich goal to get to that position. Is it really necessary to have only one man up as a striker against a team that had come to either draw or nick the game? Over to you Wenger.

Another great result but not the greatest of performances, hopefully the run can continue on Tuesday, but it may need a lot more direct football than was played for the first 80 minutes against Norwich.

Bookmark or share this story with:

Mystic Syd Predicts all I never thought I would miss Rosicky
Discussion started by Arsenal Times , 14/04/2013 11:08
Arsenal Times
14/04/2013 11:08
What do you think? You can have your say by posting below.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2013:04:16:19:08:23 by eduardo.

Gööfle11
14/04/2013 12:27
We didn't miss Rosicky. We completely controlled the game. Our issue was how pathetically poor Wilshere and Giroud were. Cazorla in the middle instead of Wilshere would have been a vast improvement on both Jack and Thomas, so let's not chat complete babble about "missing" Rosicky.

Official 1000th poster in the classic transfer rumors thread of 2014.

Padre Pio
14/04/2013 12:52
Well if we controlled game how did they have more possession and restrict us to 7 shots on target at home?
Giroud may have been poor but he was the cause of two goals.
I think you have mistaken Football for Ice Skating

"When we had to suffer the team is a lion because they suffer together." 4 July 2020 at Wolverhampton Wanderers
Arteta on his team's first away victory at a club above them in the Premiership since September 2015 at Leicester.

Gööfle11
14/04/2013 12:54
I think you have mistaken the fact that Rosicky scored two goals with Rosicky playing very well and having an influence on the way we played. He didn't play particularly well in any of the games he started in that position.

Official 1000th poster in the classic transfer rumors thread of 2014.

Shane
14/04/2013 13:31
Giroud scored, won the penalty and won the knock-down which lead to the third goal. We didn't win 8-1 this time so it's hard to rule out everything Giroud did in the game because it wasn't 'decisive'.

Gööfle11
14/04/2013 13:35
He was horrible, but a win is a win.

Official 1000th poster in the classic transfer rumors thread of 2014.

Indiangooner
14/04/2013 14:05
Giroud was pretty bad in the first half but did very well in the 2nd...... first half most of the times Giroud just tried those cute flicks and one touch passes that went no where, something we all found so irritating abt Ramsey last season

Shane
14/04/2013 14:49
Quote:
Goofle11
He was horrible, but a win is a win.

Decisive though, and his failure to score key goals - which is very much debatable - is the reason he has drawn most criticism on this website.

Giroud will find it very hard to prove people wrong if he's damned for not scoring key goals, then when he does the emphasis suddenly gets shifted on to his overall performance.

It's one of those lose-lose situations where his detractors wriggle out of giving credit where it is due, much like how virtually all of Wenger's critics spent the most of last season slamming the manager and unequivocally stating we wouldn't finish top four, then cited luck as the reason why we did.

Gööfle11
14/04/2013 14:56
If you are the starting striker at Arsenal you are bound to be decisive. The closest player to goal usually is.

Official 1000th poster in the classic transfer rumors thread of 2014.

eduardo
14/04/2013 15:07
padre Arsenal had double the possesion of norwich


find it funny how the media are kicking up a storm about the assistant giving the penalty, after all its one of the things he is there for, and this nonsense that cos he was 40 yards away(i doubt its anything like 40 yards) he should not give it, why not, he is there to give offsides that are even further away, i also like how they have gone on about the ref seeing it and not giving it, totally ignoring that the norwich player actually doing the shirt pulling fully blocks the refs view of the incident, while the assistant had as shown by their own camera angles a clear view.
Nice too that BBC and SKy have ignored Turner's forearm smash to Ramsey's face at a first half corner, a penalty and sending off offence, and how they belittle the penalty claims by walcott when he was barged over in the area

oh and yes it has to be said again Tony Gale is a bellend

*Signing Ozil is a signing Bergkamp type moment for Arsenal. It changes things utterly.*

eduardo
14/04/2013 15:12
missing Rosicky's "effectiveness in the box" is one of the funniest lines you have ever written Padre, a little bit of last game itus maybe padre, up to last week 1 goal in 66 FAPL games is not effective.

*Signing Ozil is a signing Bergkamp type moment for Arsenal. It changes things utterly.*

Indiangooner
14/04/2013 15:23
i think Rozza's last goal in the league before this brace was in the 5-2 rout of spuds at emirates

Shane
14/04/2013 15:24
Quote:
Goofle11
If you are the starting striker at Arsenal you are bound to be decisive. The closest player to goal usually is.

Weak as f*ck mate.

Gööfle11
14/04/2013 19:05
Quote:
Shane1988
Quote:
Goofle11
If you are the starting striker at Arsenal you are bound to be decisive. The closest player to goal usually is.

Weak as f*ck mate.

He is, but you wouldn't think so looking at him.

Official 1000th poster in the classic transfer rumors thread of 2014.

tigerline
15/04/2013 00:10
Giroud stunk out loud in the first half during two of gervinho's lowlight moments simply because he stopped trying.

A striker should be charging into scoring position in front of the goal on breakaways.

In the 28th minute, after cazorla's glorious pass to release gervinho, giroud who was right there beside gervinho, simply gave up on the attack. He stood up, slowed to a stroll, and was nowhere in sight when gervinho's errant shot trickled across the face of the goal. Giroud was not even in the 18-yard box when gervinho struck his shot ... It might have been a great pass if Giroud had bothered himself to try.

Then, five minutes later, when gervinho was wide right, he hit an excellent cross in front of the goal, but, AGAIN, giroud was loafing around outside of the 18-yard box instead of charging forward like strikers are expected to do ... It might have been a great pass and goal if giroud had bothered himself to try.

I generally have liked giroud's contributions This year, but that lack of attention to getting into goal-scoring territory in the first half yesterday was SHAMEFUL.

Merlion96
15/04/2013 00:50
DUnno about Giroud.
But maybe he is like Izaghi...off-side for 99 times and only need one correct 100th time to score a goal.

Effectiveness is what descirbed Giroud; and not efficiency, productivity nor killer instinct.

How many match-winners did he scored is not the question, but how many match-changing goals had he scored?
WHich is not as meaningless as Adebayor's 6 goals against Derby COunty in his 30-gaol tally.

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment. We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals. We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards. If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing abuse@sportnetwork.net
 

StreamFootball - Arsenal