By Boris Mellor
December 12 2009
Arsene Wenger has dismissed the talk of four defeats out of six as not that important. Firstly the Carling and Champions League were, "special games", he had wanted to win them but he had not played his first team. Sunderland and Chelsea had taken him by surprise, he didn't believe it was typical of his squad; it was a blip, an accident.
Asked about Fabregas's view on the need for a tall striker he replied "who would disagree?" He went on to say you always miss something. What Wenger is stressing is that you have to look to what you have, no use shifting the focus elsewhere. I think it's a mistake to big Fabregas up on this, he needs to look to himself and his team mates. They have to adapt to the new situation, not keep bemoaning it. You win with the players you have not the ones you haven't got.
I would like to see Wenger toughen up his attitude to some of the whining that goes on, and his comments this week were a step in the right direction.
However what can be deduced from his accident theory?
To my mind this is sloppy thinking, with Arsenal's defensive record the team is an accident waiting to happen. Arsenal cannot do what Villa has just done win 1-0 at Man Utd. Arsenal were better than Villa and attacked more, and like Villa went a goal up, and then unlike Villa that accident waiting to happen gave away two ludicrous goals.
Nor was he to be drawn on the importance of the match to either Liverpool or Arsenal, he believes that there are too many games left for the result to be treated as a final verdict on what it means for finishing in the top four. He believes that the league will be open this year. We all laughed when he said Chelsea would drop points, nobody expected them to drop 5 points in the next two games, and they hardly look the new invincibles now do they?
However it's all well and good your rivals dropping points, but that means nothing if you don't win your own games. It's the games that Arsenal win that will count, not the ones that their rivals lose.
It's true that the league is wide open, and that the game against Liverpool, whatever the result, will not be the end of the season for either team. It's also true that a loss for Liverpool will be more damaging to their prospects than to the Gunners.
Nonetheless, a victory, or at least a draw, will establish Arsenal as a serious contender, a defeat will not do that. A draw and then carry on beating the teams below could be an effective strategy.
That's easier said than done; Liverpool will have Torres and Gerrard back, which means that they will be a far more effective, and confident, team than of late. Without them, apart from Benayoun, they are a bunch of mediocrities. There may be a question mark over the match fitness of Torres and Gerrard, but at the end of the day you have to be prepared to play a team with its best eleven.
If Arsenal can stop Liverpool from scoring in the first half, or get a quick goal, some of the old doubts will begin to creep back, Torres or no Torres.
Time to avoid accidents
Arsenal are suffering from the absence of RVP and Bendtner, they must also learn to defend as a team. They took a step towards adapting by beating Stoke, but Liverpool away is a different kettle of fish. So apart from adapting to playing without strikers they will need to avoid accidents at the back. Anything less than a draw will expose Wenger's blip as something far worse.
Team line up?
It will probably be similar to that against Stoke, except Song will definitely be available, and Eduardo, Diaby, and Walcott are possible starters. I would rather see Arshavin in the main striker role than Eduardo. Eduardo and Nasri could make good assistant to the Russian, who if he does what he did last year none of us will complain.
Possible Line up
Almunia, Traore, Vermaelen, Gallas, Sagna, Diaby, Song, Fabregas, Eduardo, Arshavin, Nasri.
