By Boris Mellor
August 12 2009
With an away to trip Everton to start Arsenal's season it is pertinent to ask if the Gunner's defence will improve on last season. Arsenal's defence was joint poorest of the top five last season, and the worst of the top four.
Both Everton and Arsenal conceded 37 Premiership goals last season, no team that concedes 37 goals is anywhere near being a contender. Nor do teams that finish 4th rise to first the following season.
Yet Arsenal finished with 9 more points than the Toffees, the reason for that was that the Gunners scored 13 more goals. Although Everton are not a serious contender for the championship they are still capable of testing Arsenal's vulnerable defence.
Last season they took the lead with a Cahill headed goal, it was a match that Everton dominated. If the Toffees had a decent striker they may well have won, but RvP snatched a draw from the jaws of defeat with a last minute wonder goal.
However, the main issue the game demonstrated was that Arsenal often tend to concede first, and then struggle to equalise. Man U and Chelsea's superior points tally was achieved by good defending, they didn't outscore Arsenal.
Thus any improvement to Arsenal's league position must result from an improved defence. I must agree with Almunia that height is not the reason why the defence comes up short. Kolo and Gallas are not midgets, and Djourou is taller than both. The partnership of Djourou and Gallas did not stop Cahill's goal.
Our defence suffers a multiplicity of faults, yet individually they are all talented. The problem is that they don't work as a unit, and often get little support from the midfield. They often lose concentration and position, Gibbs was not the only one out of position for the disastrous Man Utd CL goal. They also refuse to attack the ball in the air, get conned at corners and set pieces; and have numerous other faults.
Will Vermaelen improve matters?
Well at 6ft he will add nothing to the height of the back four; he is also to most of us an unknown quantity. Sure Wenger will have watched him carefully, as he did with Reyes, and there lies the rub, for players who play well in European leagues do not necessarily translate their form into English.
Wenger will not have bought him for height reasons, so why play a zero sum game of swapping him for Kolo. What is to be gained (apart from £5 million profit)? He is probably no better or worse in the air than Toure. I can only assume that Wenger is looking for someone who can organise the chaos that is the Gunners defence.
Arsene knows the defence has to be improved or nothing can be achieved. Whether this is the right move only time will tell, and even if it is a lack of quality defensive cover may undermine its effectiveness. Wenger is also looking for a defender that has pace and can play out from the back. Something that the defence has become increasingly ineffective at.
The Belgium has a track record, he has during his time with Ajax, won the Dutch League Championship in 2003/04, also winning the Dutch National Cup on two occasions (in 2006 and 2007) and the Dutch Super Cup twice (in 2006 and 2007).Last season he captained Ajax, hopefully he can help the back four organise, I have no evidence that he will succeed in doing that, but I assume that is what he has been bought for, if he can't then it will be another trophy less season.
Quote:Tom14
Arsenal have the worst organisation in the Premier league I would argue, that seems pretty obvious to me.


