Chelsea
Justice for the Chels! Liverpool 1 Chelsea 1+VIDEO
KOP THAT!
By dixon9
April 23 2008
When you think of justice campaigns in football Liverpool would probably be the first club that pops into your head but it was Chelsea fans who were hoping for payback time after some of the bad luck endured against their nemesis in European semi-finals. Last night, at Anfield, in the 94th minute, we got some of it thanks to Riise in one of the most bizarre matches in European football.
Aurelio was stretchered off during the 2nd half and when Riise took to the field there were groans in anticipation from both sets of fans for different reasons.
The Norwegian has often been the scourge of our club with his long range efforts and for him to come on at a time when Liverpool were already on top and Grant was dithering what exactly to do about it (4-4-2 you numpty! How many more times!) (Here you go again dixon9 – change the record! – Ed) just brought more depression on the apparently inevitable outcome. In contrast, the reaction from some Liverpool fans at least wouldn’t have been positive as they believe their once reliable, solid full back is nowhere near as….er….well….reliable and solid.
This substitution was to provide a deliciously poetic ending to the encounter right in front of the kop end whilst they were in full-on “Oooh looook at us! We’re on the tele, and were singing “You Never Walk Alone! (again!)” mode as Riise stooped down and headed into the roof of his own net after an angled low cross across the face of goal from Kalou.
There never has been or probably never will be a better way to silence the red side of Merseyside in their own back yard!
The rest of the match? Oh yes! That! Well, I’d say it was a bit more aesthetic for the neutral than our previous encounters against Liverpool but whilst not reaching the “Sh-t hanging off a stick” earlier versions the twig still whiffed a little bit.
We started well (ish) and had the better of the first 20 mins or so and then Liverpool came back more into it and I’d say honours were more or less even after the first 45mins in terms of territorial advantage.
The 2nd half started off all Liverpool who played with verve and purpose whilst we began to wilt frustratingly. The writing appeared to be on the wall and I began to find myself thinking we don´t deserve anything after our limp attitude and inept manager.
We began to wake up with 20 mins to go and Liverpool seemed to accept that we’d get back into it at some point and surprisingly backed off.
Chances? For our part, Joe Cole of all people missed the most guilt edged chance of the match after uncharacteristically sticking a leg out Sunday League style with just Reyna to beat after a superb ball from Ballack.
The 2nd half saw fluffs or poor finishing from Kalou, Ballack and Malouda after some of the best moves of the match.
Liverpool had their chances to extend the lead but thanks to the combination of Cech and apparently unconfident Torres we were spared.
Gerrard provided the most purposeful assault on our goal after a classic cut inside and fire in a rasper move which we have seen him do so often – fortunately, Cech again kept the scoreline to 1-0 with an equally classic reaction save.
What else? Well, if there ever was a match which displayed Grant’s weakeness in decision making when the chips were down then this was it. Drogba was isolated as usual but Grant only decided to provide the Ivorian with more support in the 84th min when he finally relented and allowed Anelka to spring onto the Anfield turf but the icing in the cake happened earlier when the Israeli removed our most influential player on the park in Ballack.
The ref! Without doubt one of the worst referee’s (and linesman) I have ever seen put a whistle in his mouth! Throughout the match, there were a constant series of unfathomable decisions favouring both sides and there can be no doubt that the cagey affairs which Liverpool/Chelsea games usually prove to be were not helped at all by his performance. Indeed, the Liverpool goal in the first half came from a free-kick that never was although Lampard would have to hold his hands up after a keystone cop moment which allowed Kuyt to finish clumsily.
Still, the ending was almost perfect!
There is something slightly distasteful about smugness and schadenfruede but I’m definitely going to permit myself a hefty dollop of it for the moment – I just can’t help myself! Perhaps there really is a god up there after all or at the very least Karma does seem to have taken its toll!
Anyway, as I sign off, here’s a little treat for those of you who have often cursed Phil Thompson after listening to his sickenly biased and blinkered thinking on football and football history in general and after, some match highlights:
http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid958992159?bctid=1517402178
Match highlights:
http://soccerlens.com/liverpool-1-1-chelsea-cl-semifinal-video-highlights/7226/
Digg
Delicious
Facebook
Reddit
StumbleuponJustice for the Chels! Liverpool 1 Chelsea 1
Discussion started by 50 Years Over 100 Years , 23/04/2008 17:56
50 Years Over 100 Years
23/04/2008 17:56
23/04/2008 17:56
Justice for the Chels! Liverpool 1 Chelsea 1
"singing You Never Walk Alone! (again!)", it certainly beats being at the Bridge where you can hear a guy rustling his bag of crisps, the guy in from turning round and going "sshhhhhhhh,I say old chap, keep the noise down I'm trying to watch a football match here!"
Reclaim the Kop campaign anyone?
.
"It is born out of hypocrisy and fundamental insecurity. There have been two kids on the block for the past 12 years. Suddenly, there is a third and that one is threatening to be more successful than the others and they dont like it." P Kenyon.
.
"It is born out of hypocrisy and fundamental insecurity. There have been two kids on the block for the past 12 years. Suddenly, there is a third and that one is threatening to be more successful than the others and they dont like it." P Kenyon.
Up to the point Liverpool scored - never a free-kick in the first place - we were comfortable.
After they scored we lost the plot and then Grant confused matters even more by bringing on Kalou for Joey and why did he start Malouda in the first place?
Anyway - have to say another masterclass in substutions from the 'stooopid one.' A few minutes to go he brings on Anelka who didnt get a touch whilst he was on but was behind for Riise's classic header, deep, deep into injury time
My nightmares have been cleansed.
Don't Gamble, Bet Risk Free
After they scored we lost the plot and then Grant confused matters even more by bringing on Kalou for Joey and why did he start Malouda in the first place?
Anyway - have to say another masterclass in substutions from the 'stooopid one.' A few minutes to go he brings on Anelka who didnt get a touch whilst he was on but was behind for Riise's classic header, deep, deep into injury time
My nightmares have been cleansed.
Don't Gamble, Bet Risk Free
Xile...
Chavs laughing at our atmosphere, you have ta be joking. used ta go to the bridge in 80's it was a total joke. And believe me it aint changed was there for the CC this year. You only sung at the end when you's knew you were through.
Chavs laughing at our atmosphere, you have ta be joking. used ta go to the bridge in 80's it was a total joke. And believe me it aint changed was there for the CC this year. You only sung at the end when you's knew you were through.
We're laughing at Riise
and compared to the last two semi-finals the atmosphere was sh**te last night.
At the end you could have dropped a pin in the Kop and heard it bounce, providing it didnt get nicked first.
Don't Gamble, Bet Risk Free
and compared to the last two semi-finals the atmosphere was sh**te last night.
At the end you could have dropped a pin in the Kop and heard it bounce, providing it didnt get nicked first.
Don't Gamble, Bet Risk Free
The atmosphere was great not as good as 05 but still very good.By the way yes the goal did stop YNWAin its tracks but we did finish it off.66 was you their?
Carra. No I wasn't there last night I was too busy laughing at home watching it on the telly.
And before you ask I wont be at Stamford Bridge next Wednesday nor any other Chelsea game until the 'stooooooopid one' is on his toes - next season's season ticket is all sorted and for as long as 'the stoooooooopid one' is at the helm, I wont be going - but I know I will still have a season ticket and it will be in safe hands.
I can still support my club (Since 66) but not the manager.
I just don't like him
Don't Gamble, Bet Risk Free
And before you ask I wont be at Stamford Bridge next Wednesday nor any other Chelsea game until the 'stooooooopid one' is on his toes - next season's season ticket is all sorted and for as long as 'the stoooooooopid one' is at the helm, I wont be going - but I know I will still have a season ticket and it will be in safe hands.
I can still support my club (Since 66) but not the manager.
I just don't like him
Don't Gamble, Bet Risk Free
Er have I missed something, somewhere??
Whats all this karma cr@p and justice for chavs??
Whats all this karma cr@p and justice for chavs??
Agreed not as good as 05,but still better than what the chavs could ever do.
my take on the 2nd leg would be, get rid of this zonal marking & wing backs. Straight solid back four with the old 4-4-2 with proper wingers 2 up front crouch & Torres.
Hit em hard in midfield, let em no were there coz all I saw from chelski at Anfield moaning & winging & drogba with his gay diving. I admit he's a good player when he stays on his feet, but it's just frustrating he spent more time on his rear end & he wern't even touched.
I will be the first ta applaud you's if you beat us with good football, but i'm expecting the same from plastic fc at the bridge. I know rafa's more tactical acute than grunt he's to one dimensioal.....
So beware, IN RAFA WE TRUST.
my take on the 2nd leg would be, get rid of this zonal marking & wing backs. Straight solid back four with the old 4-4-2 with proper wingers 2 up front crouch & Torres.
Hit em hard in midfield, let em no were there coz all I saw from chelski at Anfield moaning & winging & drogba with his gay diving. I admit he's a good player when he stays on his feet, but it's just frustrating he spent more time on his rear end & he wern't even touched.
I will be the first ta applaud you's if you beat us with good football, but i'm expecting the same from plastic fc at the bridge. I know rafa's more tactical acute than grunt he's to one dimensioal.....
So beware, IN RAFA WE TRUST.
I was there last night too and I can verify the singing did stop for a minute or so, as it would a goal for either team, it was soon resumed though.
BTW, your fans are absolute shiiite.
---------------------------------
“Liverpool Football club exists not to make money, it exists to win trophies and be a source of pride for its supporters. It serves no other purpose.”. Bill Shankly
BTW, your fans are absolute shiiite.
---------------------------------
“Liverpool Football club exists not to make money, it exists to win trophies and be a source of pride for its supporters. It serves no other purpose.”. Bill Shankly
Tut tut Waspy.
Fancy being pulled up by this idiot. He never noticed the misspelling of the word 'dimensional' though, nor picked you up on 'em', 'ta', 'no' and coz. Ffs.
Under Rafa u aint scored at Stamford Bridge, unless u pull
reckon u will either way next Wednesday
Don't Gamble, Bet Risk Free
reckon u will either way next Wednesday
Don't Gamble, Bet Risk Free
Quote:Reds
I was there last night too and I can verify the singing did stop for a minute or so, as it would a goal for either team, it was soon resumed though.
BTW, your fans are absolute shiiite.
So are yours! Ner ner na ner ner!
Funny how things change - some (BUT not all) Liverpool fans are sooooo twisted and bitter.
Weve always had one of the best away supports for example in the country - I was at Anfiled on one ocassion when the Liverpool fans actually applauded us for our support.
We have the 5th highest ALL TIME average attendance in the English league.
There have been ups and downs of course - but to be 5th in 100 years of history out of all the English league clubs has merit in my book.
As for (SOME) of your fans Kate.... Are you going to be rushing the turnstiles at the Bridge again Kate? Scallies getting in with forged tickets KNOWING that they are going to be depriving true fans of a seat? Trying to sneak kids in inside sports holdalls? Or are you going to be robbing your own - young and old - of tickets to get in?
Call us Shiite if you like Kate - but at least our fans havent killed anyone - and THAT IS HISTORY.
At least our "Shiite" fans arent chanted at with "Murderers!" by others eh Kate?
This, unfortunately sums up what some (but not ALL) of your fans have become:
You can bleat on as much as you like about your trophies - but anytime you come on here with your bandwagon "Your fans are shiite!" "No tradition!" "No history!" then Im going to keep on ramming it right up there!
.
"It is born out of hypocrisy and fundamental insecurity. There have been two kids on the block for the past 12 years. Suddenly, there is a third and that one is threatening to be more successful than the others and they dont like it." P Kenyon.
Dixon Dixon such bile n bitterness.Its an observation of most football fans not just us.Your a plastic manufactured club ,with aid of a Russian billionaires money have propelled itself into the big time.Weve blocked your path in Europe not by cheating or by luck we deserved it end of live with it.Resorting to cheap shots about dissaters weve been involved in the past is fine BUT back your stories up with evidence not stories passed word of mouth .If you want to debate Hysell / Hillsborough we have a peminent thread on our site were you or anyone else will be most welcome.
He does the same over that as well carra. Completely dismisses the official report and goes with the @#$%& rag.
---------------------------------
“Liverpool Football club exists not to make money, it exists to win trophies and be a source of pride for its supporters. It serves no other purpose.”. Bill Shankly
---------------------------------
“Liverpool Football club exists not to make money, it exists to win trophies and be a source of pride for its supporters. It serves no other purpose.”. Bill Shankly
So no come back on your history then?
Our fans are absolutely shiite are they?
Heres what Juventus fans think of your oh so great fans:
ALL PART OF YOUR HISTORY.
.
"It is born out of hypocrisy and fundamental insecurity. There have been two kids on the block for the past 12 years. Suddenly, there is a third and that one is threatening to be more successful than the others and they dont like it." P Kenyon.
Our fans are absolutely shiite are they?
Heres what Juventus fans think of your oh so great fans:
ALL PART OF YOUR HISTORY.
.
"It is born out of hypocrisy and fundamental insecurity. There have been two kids on the block for the past 12 years. Suddenly, there is a third and that one is threatening to be more successful than the others and they dont like it." P Kenyon.
The Ultras at Juve Dixon ,you avnt got the foggiest about what happend at Hysell have you.Their actions at Anfield was condemed by Juve and the Italian goverment .As i said if you want to debate Hysell in a proper fasion fine weve nothing to hide warts an all. But picking out pictures of looney ulrtas is just silly.
Lets not blame the actions of the few thats put the the responsibility and taint the many...
All part of their HISTORY though isnt it?
Weve had a gutful of bitter fans coming on here crowing away about their history (really they mean trophies) and slating our fans - whilst they do so I shall defend us to the hilt and ram right up there where they dont like it.
They want to talk HISTORY - Ill talk history.
.
"It is born out of hypocrisy and fundamental insecurity. There have been two kids on the block for the past 12 years. Suddenly, there is a third and that one is threatening to be more successful than the others and they dont like it." P Kenyon.
Weve had a gutful of bitter fans coming on here crowing away about their history (really they mean trophies) and slating our fans - whilst they do so I shall defend us to the hilt and ram right up there where they dont like it.
They want to talk HISTORY - Ill talk history.
.
"It is born out of hypocrisy and fundamental insecurity. There have been two kids on the block for the past 12 years. Suddenly, there is a third and that one is threatening to be more successful than the others and they dont like it." P Kenyon.
Your talkin about my clubs history thats fine ,im proud of my clubs history and will talk about it till the cows come home warts n all i will stand by it.Yes weve won trophies, we have been to the very top,and to the very very bottom.Its what binds us together we enjoy the great nights because we can hold it in context against the reality of whats happend .If you win next week good luck to you Dixon after all its a game theres always next season.
Carra, you are one of the few Liverpool fans on this network Ive got time for but I want you to understand one thing...
We are fed up with oppo fans coming on here with no other intention than slating and slagging us on "history" or "tradition" or whatever other noun you care to use to describe what they really mean anyway....Trophies. If that isnt enough we get our fans constantly slated for whatever reason.
In my view, this is the typical attitude of the ignorant, Sky, Premier League educated fan (If you look at our record re fans and trophies even pre-Abramovich it aint exactly THAT bad anyway).
No we expect it now and again, and theres always a bit of fun and banter...and tempers can run a little high now and then - all perfectly normal and acceptable in my book BUT when its the constant whining on about it, bleating on and on ....THEN I reserve the right to give them both barrels.
May the best team go through on Wednesday.
.
"It is born out of hypocrisy and fundamental insecurity. There have been two kids on the block for the past 12 years. Suddenly, there is a third and that one is threatening to be more successful than the others and they dont like it." P Kenyon.
We are fed up with oppo fans coming on here with no other intention than slating and slagging us on "history" or "tradition" or whatever other noun you care to use to describe what they really mean anyway....Trophies. If that isnt enough we get our fans constantly slated for whatever reason.
In my view, this is the typical attitude of the ignorant, Sky, Premier League educated fan (If you look at our record re fans and trophies even pre-Abramovich it aint exactly THAT bad anyway).
No we expect it now and again, and theres always a bit of fun and banter...and tempers can run a little high now and then - all perfectly normal and acceptable in my book BUT when its the constant whining on about it, bleating on and on ....THEN I reserve the right to give them both barrels.
May the best team go through on Wednesday.
.
"It is born out of hypocrisy and fundamental insecurity. There have been two kids on the block for the past 12 years. Suddenly, there is a third and that one is threatening to be more successful than the others and they dont like it." P Kenyon.
We know it irks Chelsea when we hit you with the history thing.Its what fans do ,tis funny to a point then it can get a bit boreing,no longer original .The root cause of this debate is jealousy, why Chelsea and not us? Why have they a billionaire benefactor and we havnt?They dont deserve it what have they ever done?Blah blah blah.Ican only speak for myself but i am peeved /jealous with the position your clubs now in but would i welcome the Russians money at Anfield ?To fuuckin right i would ,with very wide open arms.The difference is when other fans moaned and gnashed teeth in our direction we could point to our outstanding history etc etc.Thats why he picked us,, Chelsea has a good history compared to many top flight teams you have always done ok in cup competions but the Russian picked you because of your location ,couldnt see him tying his cruise ship up at the the pier head or salford docks some how.The point is Dixon enjoy the moment in your clubs history to the full .I promise you Dixon LFC didnt benefit to any noticeable degree from the Moores family in the 50/60s its a pointless argument your having ,just enjoy the position your now in. Theres no need to fall to the gutter to throw dirt in our direction weve seen and heard it all before ,most of it is stupid lies ,some of it is true.Not avin a pop at you but the only way we can challenge the lies of what happend is by telling 100% truth you are most welcome to debate any miscomceptions you have over my clubs history.Good luck what ever happens Wednesday and fuuckin boss result yesterday.
Agree with what has been said, were all proud of our own clubs traditions & history as so is you. So like human nature we show it. But all clubs have thier thugs & idiots which taints thier clubs, it just gives the good fans a bad name & we have ta put up with all the backlash.
So whatever you think of Heysel or Hillsborough, there is a place on our board for you's ta freely debate. We all hate what happened at these games & should never have happened.
But most have blamed us for what happened, whatever we say or do ta tell the truth about both sides of the story just gets ignored.
We certainly don't come on here Dixon ta ram our history down your throat ta make you angry, i'm sure yopu know us better than that.
But anyways whatever happens Wed night good luck, & hope theres no contraversey & the best wins.
So whatever you think of Heysel or Hillsborough, there is a place on our board for you's ta freely debate. We all hate what happened at these games & should never have happened.
But most have blamed us for what happened, whatever we say or do ta tell the truth about both sides of the story just gets ignored.
We certainly don't come on here Dixon ta ram our history down your throat ta make you angry, i'm sure yopu know us better than that.
But anyways whatever happens Wed night good luck, & hope theres no contraversey & the best wins.
Quote:carra
We know it irks Chelsea when we hit you with the history thing. Its what fans do ,tis funny to a point then it can get a bit boreing,no longer original .
Of course it gets to us Carra but not for the reasons you think (which is the irony). Liverpool fans consider history as a trophy roll call its not theres much more to it than that and the failiure to recognise that is pretty offensive to at least 90 odd % of the clubs that have won less than us and competed in the English leagues for around 130 years.
5th highest average attendance in all time English league history, we feature 5 or 6 times in the highest 10 attendances in English history, we even have a higher recoird attendance than Liverpool and even won a trophy in Europe before you did - yet we have no "history"!
The Moores money and Heysel etc are just examples of History that have nothing to do with trophies. The chanting of Murderers! or the Heysel is your history song chanted back at Liverpool when they start with their history song at us, does make me cringe a bit its a bit distasteful but so is the history song chanted at us - but at a football match you aint gonna get intellectuals with glasses debating whilst sagely puffing their pipes are you?
Quote:carra
The root cause of this debate is jealousy, why Chelsea and not us? Why have they a billionaire benefactor and we havnt?They dont deserve it what have they ever done?Blah blah blah.Ican only speak for myself but i am peeved /jealous with the position your clubs now in but would i welcome the Russians money at Anfield ?To fuuckin right i would ,with very wide open arms. .
Refreshing honesty Kate will now go into spontaneous combustion! To be fair, I dont see how you CANT admit to that anyway? Many were hoping and praying for H&G and now DIC precisely because they realise or feel that without the extra non-generated football money they wont be able to build their stadium or buy XXX players i.e BUY success! Kate has often slated Abramovich yet seemingly fails to comprehend that the Moores fortune came from Littlewoods Pools - a man that got rich using the hopes of the working class! Really, he was a glorified bookie in terms of making money and yet it was this money helping your club.
Quote:carra
The difference is when other fans moaned and gnashed teeth in our direction we could point to our outstanding history etc etc.Thats why he picked us,, Chelsea has a good history compared to many top flight teams you have always done ok in cup competions but the Russian picked you because of your location ,couldnt see him tying his cruise ship up at the the pier head or salford docks some how.The point is Dixon enjoy the moment in your clubs history to the full . .
Exactly Captain trophywise not brilliant at all but not THAT bad. And yes, we are enjoying our current success to the full.
Quote:carra
I promise you Dixon LFC didnt benefit to any noticeable degree from the Moores family in the 50/60s its a pointless argument your having ,just enjoy the position your now in. Theres no need to fall to the gutter to throw dirt in our direction weve seen and heard it all before ,most of it is stupid lies ,some of it is true.Not avin a pop at you but the only way we can challenge the lies of what happend is by telling 100% truth you are most welcome to debate any miscomceptions you have over my clubs history.Good luck what ever happens Wednesday and fuuckin boss result yesterday.
Respectfully, I disagree with you on the Moores money. My view (in fact I KNOW) that Moores was financially involved with your club since the 60s whilst Chairman of Everton and it was this money that helped a frustrated Shanks get Liverpool out of the old 2nd. Kate seems to think that the Moores money didnt help your club at all and that the Moores involvement didnt begin until David Moores became chairman of Liverpool! I disagree with this.
As for gutter throwing dirt etc, yes, youre right BUT its normally as a defence (i.e Its not us that normally starts it on this network) to the same old history argument we get bitterly thrown at us weve had a gutful.
Was a great result yesterday probably too much too late though.
"It is born out of hypocrisy and fundamental insecurity. There have been two kids on the block for the past 12 years. Suddenly, there is a third and that one is threatening to be more successful than the others and they dont like it." P Kenyon.
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2008:04:27:12:47:31 by dixon9.
Dixon its all very well you saying "i know what happend" to justify your argument about thr Moores family involvment with LFC but you fail to show your evidence.Where as Reds has laid out all the facts n figures from that era to proove her argument.Until you can provide evidence you have not a leg to stand on.Believe you me we are well aware of our history/hereitage and its more than trophies .Isupport LFC because my father did and his father before him We remember all the trophies and the 39 and 96 its woven through psyche .For you to justify using disassters were people lost their lives as a responce to jibes/fun at your clubs history is crass .
But thats just it Carra - you USE what you (or others do - maybe not you personally) perceive as our lack of history YET rebuke us for reminding you of events that really happened in your own clubs history. You cant have it both ways.
Sure, the events are sad - but they are there nonetheless and expecting a football crowd not to use it against you when Liverpool taunt us during a match over the lack (according to them) of ours is a bit naive. Stones and glass houses and all that...
As for Moores, I satnd by what I say - do you disagree with ALL of what I said above re Moores? If not, which bits yes and which bits no - and I say the same to Reds...
.
"It is born out of hypocrisy and fundamental insecurity. There have been two kids on the block for the past 12 years. Suddenly, there is a third and that one is threatening to be more successful than the others and they dont like it." P Kenyon.
Sure, the events are sad - but they are there nonetheless and expecting a football crowd not to use it against you when Liverpool taunt us during a match over the lack (according to them) of ours is a bit naive. Stones and glass houses and all that...
As for Moores, I satnd by what I say - do you disagree with ALL of what I said above re Moores? If not, which bits yes and which bits no - and I say the same to Reds...
.
"It is born out of hypocrisy and fundamental insecurity. There have been two kids on the block for the past 12 years. Suddenly, there is a third and that one is threatening to be more successful than the others and they dont like it." P Kenyon.
So you believe its perfectly ok to throw Munich at Manu ,its their history is it not? We have our "morons" who sing it at MANU as a retort to our tradgedies but its no excuse 2 wrongs never make a right. Your excuse to sing about Hysell/ Hillsborough is pathetic grow up. You cant give any evidence of the Moores family bankrolling LFC otherwise you would of presented it by now .Leave it the more you carry on the bigger fool you look.But i just know your going to come back with a silly response.The last word ok.
How you can compare the Munich disaster which was an aircraft accident to Liverpool hooligans killing 39 Juventus fans on a football terrace is beyond me Im afraid.
Liverpool fans calling Mancs "Munichs" just makes them look stupid. You seem to be saying that one is th same as the other - it isnt and Im at a loss as to why you think so. One action was wilful violence - the other was an airline accident!
..and dont forget Chelsea fans have a particular historical interest in Heysel because you tried to put the blame on Chelsea fans for it.
.
"It is born out of hypocrisy and fundamental insecurity. There have been two kids on the block for the past 12 years. Suddenly, there is a third and that one is threatening to be more successful than the others and they dont like it." P Kenyon.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008:04:27:17:20:14 by dixon9.
Liverpool fans calling Mancs "Munichs" just makes them look stupid. You seem to be saying that one is th same as the other - it isnt and Im at a loss as to why you think so. One action was wilful violence - the other was an airline accident!
..and dont forget Chelsea fans have a particular historical interest in Heysel because you tried to put the blame on Chelsea fans for it.
.
"It is born out of hypocrisy and fundamental insecurity. There have been two kids on the block for the past 12 years. Suddenly, there is a third and that one is threatening to be more successful than the others and they dont like it." P Kenyon.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008:04:27:17:20:14 by dixon9.
Chelsea fans at Anfield were singing about Hillsborough Dixon ,but that ok in your book .If you want to debate Hysell fine your most welcome to our perminent thread.
Quote:dixon9
Sure, the events are sad - but they are there nonetheless and expecting a football crowd not to use it against you when Liverpool taunt us during a match over the lack (according to them) of ours is a bit naive. Stones and glass houses and all that...
.
But it's only a song about having no history, but obviously you do have a bit.
Singing back at us about our fans who died at Hillsborough is not on the same scale.
Not just that I don't agree with our fans singing bout Munich, thats wrong too.
We'be got no history - obviously we have!!!
In your history - its blood!!!
Let me tell you something. Through the 70s and 80s I admired Liverpool especially for their European triumphs. I remember the Bruce knee-shake during the penalty shoot-out against Roma.
But then on the day I went to Leicester and we got beat 2-0 I came home and read and watched the horrors of Hillsborough. (On that day we were drinking with Leicester's top boys after the game).
That day my admiration for Liverpool died and then what happened later on in history you mugs did it again in Belgium and for both incidents you say it wasn't your fault.
To me Liverpool are nothing but @#$%& and MURDERERS and blaming all and sundry except for yourselves is just pathetic!!
You can hold as many memorial services as you like - aint gonna change a thought in the minds of rival supporters - including mine!
Don't Gamble, Bet Risk Free
In your history - its blood!!!
Let me tell you something. Through the 70s and 80s I admired Liverpool especially for their European triumphs. I remember the Bruce knee-shake during the penalty shoot-out against Roma.
But then on the day I went to Leicester and we got beat 2-0 I came home and read and watched the horrors of Hillsborough. (On that day we were drinking with Leicester's top boys after the game).
That day my admiration for Liverpool died and then what happened later on in history you mugs did it again in Belgium and for both incidents you say it wasn't your fault.
To me Liverpool are nothing but @#$%& and MURDERERS and blaming all and sundry except for yourselves is just pathetic!!
You can hold as many memorial services as you like - aint gonna change a thought in the minds of rival supporters - including mine!
Don't Gamble, Bet Risk Free
Well they also mention Heysel - the Hillsborough bit does make me cringe although Im not going to go into the issues of blame there - theres no point - it justs snowballs into a massive argument. Id prefer that it wasnt in the song of course.
The fact is, you cant just crow on and on about your trophies disguised as "history" and then not accept a particular event which caused untold damage to English football in Europe - you seem to think that everybody should be looking up to your club in history, without realising that, in reality, it woulod have been a lot better for Football if some of your history never happened.
Crow on as much as you like - but dont moan when some of it comes back and hits you in the face if you slate others.
.
"It is born out of hypocrisy and fundamental insecurity. There have been two kids on the block for the past 12 years. Suddenly, there is a third and that one is threatening to be more successful than the others and they dont like it." P Kenyon.
The fact is, you cant just crow on and on about your trophies disguised as "history" and then not accept a particular event which caused untold damage to English football in Europe - you seem to think that everybody should be looking up to your club in history, without realising that, in reality, it woulod have been a lot better for Football if some of your history never happened.
Crow on as much as you like - but dont moan when some of it comes back and hits you in the face if you slate others.
.
"It is born out of hypocrisy and fundamental insecurity. There have been two kids on the block for the past 12 years. Suddenly, there is a third and that one is threatening to be more successful than the others and they dont like it." P Kenyon.
Dixon.......you started this months ago by saying Shanks was given 2 million quid to get us out of the 2nd division and that's how we went on to win trophies.
Stop back peddling. If you're now saying we were only given a handout, state what it was and what great top class players it allowed us to get, plastic Chelsea style.
One of Shanks all time favourite players was Denis Law who he had at Huddersfield. He wanted him at Anfield and Denis was quite happy to join Shanks there. We couldn't afford him, why was that when he only cost City and United 55,000 and 100,000 respectively, if as you say we were buying trophies plastic Chelsea style?
With 2 million we could have bought 40 Laws at the City price and 20 at the United price.
Not worth even talking Heysel or Hillsborough here lads, they don't even know their own very violent fan history.
---------------------------------
“Liverpool Football club exists not to make money, it exists to win trophies and be a source of pride for its supporters. It serves no other purpose.”. Bill Shankly
Stop back peddling. If you're now saying we were only given a handout, state what it was and what great top class players it allowed us to get, plastic Chelsea style.
One of Shanks all time favourite players was Denis Law who he had at Huddersfield. He wanted him at Anfield and Denis was quite happy to join Shanks there. We couldn't afford him, why was that when he only cost City and United 55,000 and 100,000 respectively, if as you say we were buying trophies plastic Chelsea style?
With 2 million we could have bought 40 Laws at the City price and 20 at the United price.
Not worth even talking Heysel or Hillsborough here lads, they don't even know their own very violent fan history.
---------------------------------
“Liverpool Football club exists not to make money, it exists to win trophies and be a source of pride for its supporters. It serves no other purpose.”. Bill Shankly
Back peddling???!!!!!!!!
Its YOU thats back peddling.........and try the OTHER thread Kate.....
.
"It is born out of hypocrisy and fundamental insecurity. There have been two kids on the block for the past 12 years. Suddenly, there is a third and that one is threatening to be more successful than the others and they dont like it." P Kenyon.
Its YOU thats back peddling.........and try the OTHER thread Kate.....
.
"It is born out of hypocrisy and fundamental insecurity. There have been two kids on the block for the past 12 years. Suddenly, there is a third and that one is threatening to be more successful than the others and they dont like it." P Kenyon.
I'll write in any thread I choose Dixon, if you don't like it ban me, simple as that.
2 million = 40 Denis laws, you're a joke Dixon and you support a club who've won 1 title and bought two.
---------------------------------
“Liverpool Football club exists not to make money, it exists to win trophies and be a source of pride for its supporters. It serves no other purpose.”. Bill Shankly
2 million = 40 Denis laws, you're a joke Dixon and you support a club who've won 1 title and bought two.
---------------------------------
“Liverpool Football club exists not to make money, it exists to win trophies and be a source of pride for its supporters. It serves no other purpose.”. Bill Shankly
Dont be silly!
Im saying that the main Moores debate is on the other thread!
FFS! Full moon tonight!
.
"It is born out of hypocrisy and fundamental insecurity. There have been two kids on the block for the past 12 years. Suddenly, there is a third and that one is threatening to be more successful than the others and they dont like it." P Kenyon.
Im saying that the main Moores debate is on the other thread!
FFS! Full moon tonight!
.
"It is born out of hypocrisy and fundamental insecurity. There have been two kids on the block for the past 12 years. Suddenly, there is a third and that one is threatening to be more successful than the others and they dont like it." P Kenyon.
2 million = 40 Denis laws, you're a joke Dixon and you support a club who've won 1 title and bought two
---------------------------------
“Liverpool Football club exists not to make money, it exists to win trophies and be a source of pride for its supporters. It serves no other purpose.”. Bill Shankly
---------------------------------
“Liverpool Football club exists not to make money, it exists to win trophies and be a source of pride for its supporters. It serves no other purpose.”. Bill Shankly
Justice! LMAO
the only way you can score against LFC is a dubious penalty or we put it in our own net!
the only way you can score against LFC is a dubious penalty or we put it in our own net!
Well we wont be buying three - you aint bought a title in what is it NINETEEN YEARS!!!!!
Exactly how much as Rafa spent to win @#$%& all and you know as well as any fan does you so want the title DESPERATELY!!!!
When are you lot gonna realise Rafa WILL NEVER win the Premiership??????
Don't Gamble, Bet Risk Free
- you aint bought a title in what is it NINETEEN YEARS!!!!!
Exactly how much as Rafa spent to win @#$%& all and you know as well as any fan does you so want the title DESPERATELY!!!!
When are you lot gonna realise Rafa WILL NEVER win the Premiership??????
Don't Gamble, Bet Risk Free
Quote:LMAO PMSL
Justice! LMAO
the only way you can score against LFC is a dubious penalty or we put it in our own net!
Would be perfect to get that on Wednesday! And I bet theres a few fans of other teams that wouldnt mind seeing THAT happening to Liverpool after all the luck theyve had!
Anyway.....
Just in case youve forgotten:
">A hem! So we Cant score against you? HERE!
.
"It is born out of hypocrisy and fundamental insecurity. There have been two kids on the block for the past 12 years. Suddenly, there is a third and that one is threatening to be more successful than the others and they dont like it." P Kenyon.
Quote:dixon9
Would be perfect to get that on Wednesday! And I bet theres a few fans of other teams that wouldnt mind seeing THAT happening to Liverpool after all the luck tha've had
.
Doub't it, not in the smoke anyway...
And carra get ya arl @#$%& back on our board...
Not in the smoke! There is quite a few Liverpool fans in London actually.
.
"It is born out of hypocrisy and fundamental insecurity. There have been two kids on the block for the past 12 years. Suddenly, there is a third and that one is threatening to be more successful than the others and they dont like it." P Kenyon.
.
"It is born out of hypocrisy and fundamental insecurity. There have been two kids on the block for the past 12 years. Suddenly, there is a third and that one is threatening to be more successful than the others and they dont like it." P Kenyon.
Correct dickie,
out of prob 25 on our warehouse floor there's 5 of us, plus our 3 old bosses are Liverpool supporters with season tics.
Were taking over the country...
out of prob 25 on our warehouse floor there's 5 of us, plus our 3 old bosses are Liverpool supporters with season tics.
Were taking over the country...
Well have to fumigate London if it spreads any further!
![[:wor kid:]](/phorum-5.1.15/mods/smileys/images/13.gif "[:wor kid:]")
.
"It is born out of hypocrisy and fundamental insecurity. There have been two kids on the block for the past 12 years. Suddenly, there is a third and that one is threatening to be more successful than the others and they dont like it." P Kenyon.
.
"It is born out of hypocrisy and fundamental insecurity. There have been two kids on the block for the past 12 years. Suddenly, there is a third and that one is threatening to be more successful than the others and they dont like it." P Kenyon.
Chelsea News 24/7
More Chelsea headlines
- Man City 5-3 Chelsea: Ultimate Respect from City
- Chelsea 3-4 Man City: Fatty Shuffles Wrong Pack
- Jose to Leave Real Madrid
- Chelsea 2-1 Everton: 23 Travel to America
- Everton Preview: Last Day - Finally!!
- Benfica 1-2 Chelsea: Super Frank Signs New Deal
- FA Youth Cup Final 2nd Leg v Norwich City LIVE from 7.45pm
- Aston Villa 1-2 Chelsea: 'Super 203 Goal Frankie Lampard'
- Aston Villa Preview: Will It Be Done Today?
Chelsea latest threads
- Man City 5-3 Chelsea: Ultimate Respect from City
- Chelsea 3-4 Man City: Fatty Shuffles Wrong Pack
- Jose to Leave Real Madrid
- Chelsea 2-1 Everton: 23 Travel to America
- Everton Preview: Last Day -Finally!!
- Benfica 1-2 Chelsea: Super Frank Signs New Deal
- FA Youth Cup Final 2nd Leg v Norwich City LIVE from 7.45pm
- Aston Villa 1-2 Chelsea: 'Super 203 Goal Frankie Lampard'
- Aston Villa Preview: Will It Be Done Today?
- Chelsea 2-2 Spurs: Says It All Really!