Remy To Refuse NUFC Deal and Keep His Options Open


By Tyne-Talk
January 26 2014

Loic Remy has apparently already decided that he will not be joining Newcastle United at the end of the season when his loan deal expires. The striker, who moved to Queens Park Rangers during the January transfer window last season joined Newcastle at the beginning of this season with the option to buy at the end of the year.

Queens Park Rangers paid £8m which was a record fee for the then 26 year old to help them fight a pending relegation battle. They failed and were relegated and facing the need to offload Remy.

Since then the Frenchman has refused to be drawn on whether he would sign a permanent deal at Newcastle, seemingly using the opportunity to raise his profile and attract a Champions League side.

The tabloids are today reporting that a £10million fee had been agreed between the two clubs but that Remy has rejected the move in the hope that featuring in the World Cup could get him noticed.

Pardew said earlier this month;

 

“The plan was always that he would be on loan for the year. For us we would like to do it permanently,  but there is a long way until that happens.

 

The player and his agents need to make sure that it is right for the player and we honor that. We have no problem. Obviously We are talking to him all the time. He played well.

 

I can’t complain he has been very professional around us with everything that he has done. Obviously he has been scoring goals.”

 

Bookmark or share this story with:

Remy To Refuse NUFC Deal and Keep His Options Open
Discussion started by TyneTalk (IP Logged), 26/01/2014 11:28
TyneTalk
TyneTalk
26/01/2014 11:28
What do you think? You can have your say by posting below.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.

mentalman
mentalman
26/01/2014 12:21
if we bring a striker in this month and Remy doesn't want to sign for us permanently then i would leave him on the bench for the rest of the season, see how well noticed he gets in the world cup if he's not picked for the french squad

davenufc
davenufc
26/01/2014 12:29
I don't buy this story to be honest, I know it's everywhere, but it orginated in the sun on sunday.

It's not the remy won't join us, to be honest I have thought that for a while.

It's the 10 million I don't buy.

More nonsense made up by the southern media in a desperate attempt to have some Newcastle news, or as they possibly think on it, news from scotland.

MESSAGES->author
MissC
26/01/2014 12:33
It was £8million at the time the loan deal was sorted

Note To Self
Note To Self
26/01/2014 22:25
Quote:
mentalman
if we bring a striker in this month and Remy doesn't want to sign for us permanently then i would leave him on the bench for the rest of the season, see how well noticed he gets in the world cup if he's not picked for the french squad

Cut our nose to spite our face?

If he can do a job on the pitch, surely it would make sense to use him whilst we're paying at least part of his wages. He's a good player, we should make use of him while we can.

Take advantage of his drive to try and force himself into the France World Cup squad.

mentalman
mentalman
26/01/2014 23:13
would we not be better giving our new striker the minutes on the pitch especially if he's new to the league?

Nick-Kielce-Poland
Nick-Kielce-Poland
27/01/2014 07:20
Quote:
mentalman
if we bring a striker in this month and Remy doesn't want to sign for us permanently then i would leave him on the bench for the rest of the season, see how well noticed he gets in the world cup if he's not picked for the french squad

Well, I'm glad you're not our manager. What harm has he done to Newcastle that you would sacrifice Newcastle United's result in order to punish him - I repeat what harm has he done to Newcastle United?



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2014:01:27:07:34:14 by Nick-Kielce-Poland.

MESSAGES->author
annie
27/01/2014 10:13
We need him on the pitch.

Ian Toward
Biffins Bridge
27/01/2014 10:28
Stepping back, I see mental's point. He is not saying it as a punishment to Remy, he can please himself. It is letting new players, who are possibly our future, gel into the team.

To be fair, I think Remy has looked better alongside a striker, or more so coming in from the left. Consistency is a worry for Remy and it would stop me paying big money for him.

mentalman
mentalman
27/01/2014 10:33
say we hang on to cabaye this season and he comes out and publically says that he is leaving in the summer, do we carry on playing him or do we give someone 16 games to get them ready for taking over the position in the summer?

Are we to buy or loan a new striker who wants to be at the club and leave him on the bench to help a guy who doesn't want to stay at the club go and play at a world cup.

davenufc
davenufc
27/01/2014 11:14
I must say about 90% of me agrees with mental. In an ideal situation, if he doesn't want to be here I would prefer him on the bench myself, if we got a new striker.

Not as a punishment, more as a way to prepar for a future without him.

However the 10% that is left is probably my more practical side! says we desperately need him on the pitch.

I would love this to change, or indeed for him to sign a proper contract, but at the moment I can't see it happening.

Nick-Kielce-Poland
Nick-Kielce-Poland
27/01/2014 11:57
Quote:
mentalman
say we hang on to cabaye this season and he comes out and publically says that he is leaving in the summer, do we carry on playing him or do we give someone 16 games to get them ready for taking over the position in the summer?
Are we to buy or loan a new striker who wants to be at the club and leave him on the bench to help a guy who doesn't want to stay at the club go and play at a world cup.

It depends entirely on what the manager deems is more likely to give us results in the matches. Do you disagree?

TvA
TvA
27/01/2014 16:01
We dont get a new striker this window, there for Remy will keep playing all season.

EVEN if Cabaye and Remy doesnt want to be here next season, hopefully they will do their best to the very end, because of the World Cup.
And then, hopefully in the summer, we have more options on the transfer marked because we qualified for Europe next season. (a bit optimistic, I know)

Hopefully we could get Ba back for cheap money, and a paycut, if Chelski buys Diego Costa. Surely he would prefer to play every match, tha being 4-5 choice.

Note To Self
Note To Self
27/01/2014 17:23
Quote:
TvA
EVEN if Cabaye and Remy doesnt want to be here next season, hopefully they will do their best to the very end, because of the World Cup.

I agree with this.

Yes, it makes sense to develop those who are guaranteed to stay beyond the end of the season to help cope with their loss the next season, but Remy is a good player. He can do a decent job in an area we're under-resourced.
Why immediately replace him for a new player who has possibly been unproven at this level, when Remy has a very strong reason to perform this season?

In my view - for this season, we're paying his wages (or at least part of them), he's our player and an asset to the squad. Why should we discard him when we're already short of striking options?

mentalman
mentalman
27/01/2014 19:34
it would save going into the start of next season with our main striker and number 10 still adapting to the team.

Remy is leaving, cisse is on his way out and shola isn't going to get a new contract, that leaves gouff as our only striker so we are going to need at least 2 strikers in the summer who need to start the season at there best not settling into a new team.

If a player has already stated that he is leaving the club in the summer all he is caring about is going to the world cup, do you think he's still going to give his all and put his body on the line and risk injury.

Nick, it is up to the manager to decide what's best for the team and it all depends on what happens in training and on the pitch but Remy is hardly in startling form at the minute scoring 4 goals in the last 12 games, 2 of them coming against 9 man stoke so i would still start a new striker ahead of him

Nick-Kielce-Poland
Nick-Kielce-Poland
27/01/2014 22:59
Quote:
mentalman
it would save going into the start of next season with our main striker and number 10 still adapting to the team.
Remy is leaving, cisse is on his way out and shola isn't going to get a new contract, that leaves gouff as our only striker so we are going to need at least 2 strikers in the summer who need to start the season at there best not settling into a new team.

If a player has already stated that he is leaving the club in the summer all he is caring about is going to the world cup, do you think he's still going to give his all and put his body on the line and risk injury.

Nick, it is up to the manager to decide what's best for the team and it all depends on what happens in training and on the pitch but Remy is hardly in startling form at the minute scoring 4 goals in the last 12 games, 2 of them coming against 9 man stoke so i would still start a new striker ahead of him

As I said, if results in the matches this season is the reason for dropping Remy, or picking him, that's fine. As long as it's not about punishing him, then I'm fine, whatever the manager decides.

MESSAGES->author
MissC
27/01/2014 23:03
Now cabaye is off remy won't be far behind.

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment. We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals. We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards. If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing abuse@sportnetwork.net