Oh yes, I recall,  they called it the League Cup, no sponsors, no ads on shirts, no names, just numbers. Anyhow we didn't win it.

Victim of success

Now there is a new generation of supporter whose "present" was winning trophy after trophy, and they expect that to continue. If Wenger made a mistake it was not to understand these fans. He realised they could not all fit into Highbury, they wanted to see their beloved Arsenal play Wenger ball, so he pushed for a bigger stadium.

What he forgot was that these new fans and many of the old, now expected to win something every season, just providing a seat for them to park their bum on was not enough. They wanted trophies too.

The unanswered questions:

Did Wenger really have a strategy for winning trophies at the new stadium? Was his youth policy a holding operation until the money arrived from the sale of the old stadium, or did he really believe he could win big time?

If the strategy was meant to save money why does the wage bill continue to be amongst the highest in the land?

Why pay 5 million for Ramsey, pay him high wages, and rarely use him? Even if he was fully developed is he what was needed? Would spending the money on Alonso have yielded higher dividends? The youth policy does not come free, and certainly not cheap.

Was the strategy his alone, or was it developed by the board in conjunction with the manager? It seems to me that the board has played a devious game, letting Wenger take flak, and claiming any glory when they can.

Asset stripping

Was the selling off of key players, and not replacing them, a deliberate policy or a reaction to a worsening financial situation? Did a cynical board more interested in property values than footballing ones allow the situation to deteriorate to protect their investment?

Will the corporate strategy succeed?

The strategy of 7000 high cost seats, raising as much as the old Highbury in total, was seen as a stroke of genius. Will that strategy survive the credit crunch? Empty seats were increasingly visible at club level this season, and they were paid for in advance. Now these people have to renew - will they?

How much damage will the credit crunch do?

I remember writing on this site that it would mean unsold houses at Highbury stadium, that there would be no bonus from Highbury Square. The only fans that replied told me I was wrong, well they still haven't sold all the now completed homes. Many of the homes are not aimed at the rich but average London earners, and they cannot get mortgages. Meanwhile the club still carries the debt for developing the old stadium. Queensland Road remains undeveloped; it's a ghost town, not a building site.

There is no Setanta Claus

Even Billionaires are keeping their money tight and are reluctant to spend. The collapse of Setanta demonstrates there is no bottomless pot of cash. Usamanov is not talking about putting his own cash in, he is suggesting we the fans cough up thousands of pounds each on a rights issue. We would pay and the billionaires play. Kroenke continues to hoover up shares, but no gifts from him either.

How much longer can the strategy continue?

The best match I saw all season (as an Arsenal fanatic) was the first leg of the youth cup final. Eleven players giving their all without any prima donnas or slouchers, it reminded me of what Wenger ball looked like. Last season was unsatisfactory for me not because there were no trophies, but because at time there was a lack of commitment, and too much sideways passing.

For other fans the main gripe is no trophies, either way the question has to be raised how much longer will fans put up with it? This season I know of a few season tickets that were not renewed. Will the trickle become a flood if things do not change?

Conclusion

No doubt there are many questions I have not raised and should be asked. Also Wenger has not completed his transfer dealings, who will come in, and just as importantly who will go? Has he already abandoned his over reliance on youth? That's a question that cannot be answered until late August.

This is not a veiled attack on Wenger, I don't believe that any manager could have achieved as much as he has done on such a limited budget. He has done for Arsenal in the 21^st Century what Chapman did in the 1930's, carried out a revolution.

When Chapman departed his legacy was a team that dominated for a decade. When Wenger decides he has had enough of managing Arsenal I sincerely hope his legacy will be more than a shiny stadium.

View a Printer Friendly version of this Story.

Bookmark or share this story with:

• Digg
• Delicious
• Facebook
• Reddit
• Stumbleupon

Related Articles:

• Match of the Dayometer measures no glory season
• Spud U Like At Fourth Rate Competition
• Wenger is the Real Deal Demo Photos Part 2
• We only win (or draw) when we don't have to