On recent results, the landscape at the top has changed. The Cumbrian club have slipped up of late, picking up only 1 point out the last possible 12, opening the way for both Nottingham Forest and Doncaster to be in a position to claim the last spot with one game to go.
The current League table shows that Doncaster have now taken second place with Forest in third on goal difference, but with just one point separating the three teams, all three could still claim the final automatic promotion place;
| Team | P | GD | PTS | |
| 1 | Swansea | 45 | 39 | 89 |
| 2 | Doncaster | 45 | 25 | 80 |
| 3 | Nottm Forest | 45 | 31 | 79 |
| 4 | Carlisle | 45 | 18 | 79 |
| 5 | Southend | 45 | 15 | 75 |
| 6 | Leeds | 45 | 33 | 73 |
Leeds' victory over Yeovil on Friday was enough to guarantee them a place in the League 1 play-off's and on the current table will finish either 5th or 6th, however before Leeds take on Gillingham next Saturday, there is a small matter of Leeds Uniteds appeal to overturn the 15 point deduction imposed on them by the Football League at the start of the season.
That decision is due by 1st May and could change the top of the table dramatically;
| Team | P | GD | PTS | |
| 1 | Swansea | 45 | 39 | 89 |
| 2 | Leeds | 45 | 33 | 88 |
| 3 | Doncaster | 45 | 25 | 80 |
| 4 | Nottm Forest | 45 | 31 | 79 |
| 5 | Carlisle | 45 | 18 | 79 |
| 6 | Southend | 45 | 15 | 75 |
A decision in Leeds' favour will cause a major problem for the Football League who potentially will see action and argument from three clubs now that could lose out. Irrespective of results next weekend, all three are bound to argue that the impact from any announcements just a few days before their final games will hamper their preparation and approach to the game.
Rumours are circulating on the Internet that the League could be looking to compensate any teams affected by the result, and there is even suggestion of increasing the number of automatic promotion places, although how this could affect the play-offs in unknown.
Of course, the result of Arbitration has yet to be announced, suffice to say that if the result does go in Leeds' favour, the results in League 1 could not have gone worse for the Football League.
Authors Comment
It is fair to sympathise with the plight of other clubs affected by the effort of Leeds United to overturn the 15 point deduction, but it is being made all the more difficult to show any empathy with the conduct of certain Chairmen, Managers and fans during this time. Nobody knows better than Leeds fans how this degree of uncertainty, and delays to important decision can impact on all matters relating to our club. We've been living with this for 10 months now - everyone else has had it for a few weeks.
What people fail to realise (or refuse to appreciate) is that Leeds United have ALWAYS maintained the decision was illegal and felt they had acted in the rules on the Football League. They asked for Arbitration only a few months in to the season, a situation every other club in the League was aware of - none of them stepped up to help.
We went to the FA, who just distanced themselves from these matters - we've been trying to get the Football League to sort this out from day one.
In the end we served a High Court order due to their refusal to listen to us, and eventually, on the final day they had to respond to the Court Order, they offered Arbitration - leading to yet more delays.The only reason we all find ourselves just 6 days from the end of the season with this still unresolved in because of the approach of the Football League, nothing to do with Leeds United.
So should we have taken our punishment and just walked away? No! The Club feels very strongly that what the Football League did was illegal - it always has and Arbitration will decide once and for all whether we have a point. IF it is found in our favour, then we have done a service to all clubs, in all Leagues in standing up to the Governing Body and winning a battle for all of us. You need no further proof than to look at the bottom of League 1 right now at Luton and Bournemouth!
One key point is all of this is that Leeds did not get a CVA in place as HMRC wanted to take the matter to Court. They disputed that KPMG were going to pay all footballing debts in full and then anything left from CVA amount would go to other creditors (inc. HMRC) - Why? Because League rules say so! HMRC were taking Leeds to court for try to obey the League rules? HMRC have said they will do the same with every other Administration case involving a Football Club.
Is the Leeds Arbitration thing a farce? Yes, you got it in one - welcome to our world!
Oh and one final point – the 15 points we are looking for – they are ours, we did win them, we are not just being given them!
Bookmark or share this story with:
Related Articles:
| 27 Apr, 2008 06:45 | Report |
|
Unofficial Leeds United (IP Logged) Unregistered User |
| 27 Apr, 2008 07:01 | Report |
|
whitey71 (IP Logged) hate all tudkey cnuts |
Date Joined: Jun, 2005 Location: whitey Posts: 4079 |
| 27 Apr, 2008 07:21 | Report |
|
Ian Baird 1-0 (IP Logged) Bates saved Leeds, my ar*e!! |
Date Joined: Nov, 2004 Location: South West England Posts: 3780 |
| 27 Apr, 2008 08:10 | Report |
|
the artist formerly known as The Trav (IP Logged) Sir |
Date Joined: Jan, 2008 Location: Adelaide, Australia Posts: 1410 |
Quote:Oh and one final point – the 15 points we are looking for – they are ours, we did win them, we are not just being given them!

| 27 Apr, 2008 08:24 | Report |
|
mick (IP Logged) Registered User |
Date Joined: Apr, 2007 Location: Posts: 424 |
| 27 Apr, 2008 08:30 | Report |
|
warringtonwhite (IP Logged) Registered User |
Date Joined: Feb, 2008 Location: Posts: 615 |

| 27 Apr, 2008 08:31 | Report |
|
Lord Buckethead (IP Logged) Registered User |
Date Joined: Apr, 2007 Location: Posts: 627 |
| 27 Apr, 2008 08:31 | Report |
|
kiwipete (IP Logged) EL PRESIDENTE |
Date Joined: Apr, 2005 Location: CNUT CLUB HQ--AUCKLAND Posts: 8201 |


| 27 Apr, 2008 08:46 | Report |
|
lee-ds (IP Logged) Pin Head |
Date Joined: Apr, 2007 Location: The Capital Of Yorkshire Posts: 3228 |
| 27 Apr, 2008 08:52 | Report |
|
Sprake (IP Logged) Registered User |
Date Joined: Apr, 2007 Location: Posts: 1610 |
| 27 Apr, 2008 09:02 | Report |
|
lee-ds (IP Logged) Pin Head |
Date Joined: Apr, 2007 Location: The Capital Of Yorkshire Posts: 3228 |
| 27 Apr, 2008 09:09 | Report |
|
It didn't kill me, it made me a Leeds fan. |
Date Joined: Nov, 2004 Location: Good ol Madras Posts: 19996 |
| 27 Apr, 2008 09:15 | Report |
|
leedsnproud (IP Logged) Registered User |
Date Joined: Mar, 2008 Location: Posts: 953 |
| 27 Apr, 2008 09:19 | Report |
|
Lef (IP Logged) Registered User |
Date Joined: Apr, 2007 Location: Posts: 430 |
Quote:Fids
One key point is all of this is that Leeds did not get a CVA in place as HMRC wanted to take the matter to Court. They disputed that KPMG were going to pay all footballing debts in full and then anything left from CVA amount would go to other creditors (inc. HMRC) - Why? Because League rules say so! HMRC were taking Leeds to court for try to obey the League rules? HMRC have said they will do the same with every other Administration case involving a Football Club.
| 27 Apr, 2008 09:42 | Report |
|
Wocko (IP Logged) Registered User |
Date Joined: Nov, 2004 Location: Posts: 14393 |

)PREDICTION LEAGUE WINNER
| 27 Apr, 2008 11:08 | Report |
|
Simples! |
Date Joined: Nov, 2006 Location: Another Poo-Hole, this time, Darn Sarf!! Posts: 1155 |
Quote:leedsnproud
only one thing worries me could the FL refuse to implement,the ruling if it goes in our favour,and ignore the Arbitration ruling.

| 27 Apr, 2008 11:08 | Report |
|
Registered User |
Date Joined: Apr, 2007 Location: Posts: 1855 |
| 27 Apr, 2008 11:36 | Report |
|
Russ LUFC (IP Logged) Registered User |
Date Joined: Apr, 2007 Location: Posts: 559 |
| 27 Apr, 2008 12:06 | Report |
|
Robbie11 (IP Logged) Registered User |
Date Joined: Apr, 2007 Location: Posts: 543 |
Quote:leedsnproud
only one thing worries me could the FL refuse to implement,the ruling if it goes in our favour,and ignore the Arbitration ruling.
| 27 Apr, 2008 12:09 | Report |
|
Registered User |
Date Joined: Apr, 2007 Location: Posts: 1855 |
Quote:Zandra LaPoIQuote:leedsnproud
only one thing worries me could the FL refuse to implement,the ruling if it goes in our favour,and ignore the Arbitration ruling.
Damn good question LNP, anyone with a legal mind know the answer?
| 27 Apr, 2008 12:13 | Report |
|
Aquatic Fanatic (IP Logged) Registered User |
Date Joined: Apr, 2007 Location: Posts: 1480 |
| 27 Apr, 2008 12:20 | Report |
|
Registered User |
Date Joined: Apr, 2007 Location: Posts: 1855 |
| 27 Apr, 2008 12:49 | Report |
|
Registered User |
Date Joined: Apr, 2007 Location: Farsley Posts: 161 |
| 27 Apr, 2008 13:14 | Report |