Username
Password
Does Jackson actually deserve a new contract?
By Nathan Jackson
November 19 2008
Peter Jackson looks set to sign a new contract at Sincil Bank. City's manager claimed a few weeks back that he would only sign it when he felt he had deserved it, now it seems almost strange that he feels he deserves it after losing nearly half of his games in charge of the Imps. Lord of the Imps? Erm, very debateable.

Peter Jackson may have a better winning percentage than either Keith Alexander and John Schofield, but the difference is that Jackson also has a considerably worse losing percentage. Jackson's Imps have lost nearly half  of the games in which he has been their manager, with Schofield losing just over 40% and Keith losing just over a third.

Keith Alexander 2002-2006 (171 GAMES - another 13 managed by Gary Simpson during Keith's treatment))

SITUATION

OCCURANCES

PERCENTAGE

WIN

65

38.24%

DRAW

48

28.24%

LOSE

57

33.53%

Another worrying trend with Jackson, unlike the previous permanent managers is that Jackson certainly doesn't know how to use his substitutes. On many occasions over the past twelve months, Jackson has waited until it is too late to make substitutions. The most prime examples of this came in two games this season. The first being a home game against Dagenham and Redbridge. City were playing poorly and had just gone 2-1 down, no activity could be seen on the City bench. It was only until Dagenham scored a very late third that there was even any movement on the bench....by which time it was too late.

John Schofield - 2006 (1 game) and 2006-2007 (64 games)

SITUATION

OCCURANCES

PERCENTAGE

WIN

23

35.38%

DRAW

14

21.54%

LOSE

28

43.08%

The second incident coming in the FA Cup defeat to Kettering Town. Jackson clearly thought that extra-time was coming and instead of making the substitutions with about 10/15 minutes to go to get the players warmed up, he decided to wait until Kettering had scored before bringing on two players.

Peter Jackson - 2007-present (39 games)

SITUATION

OCCURANCES

PERCENTAGE

WIN

17

39.53%

DRAW

6

13.95%

LOSE

20

46.51%

These aren't the only frustrating parts of Jackson's management as he is consistantly playing a formation THAT DOES NOT WORK. What is the point of only playing one striker when you hoof it up to them? The best that they can do is head it down into no-man's-land and watch as a defender swoops it clear. Ben Wright for example, he won a lot of headers against Kettering but he had no one with him to take advantage.

Many people will claim it's a 4-3-3, but when you're playing 4-3-3 then I'd certainly want a more consistant performer than Dany N'Guessan being one of the three, and his opposite having the worst first touch since Jamie Hand. It amazes me that Jackson is constantly playing players that simply don't perform. Infact, there are only about four players who I think are reasonably consistant and they are Rob Burch, Danny Hone, Janos Kovacs and Stefan Oakes.

Then of course we link Oakes to these supposed "magnificant" signings that Jackson makes. I certainly wouldn't call Gall magnificant, I'd even go as far as saying that playing with Gall is effectively playing with 10 men. I don't give a flying whoopy-di-do if he puts effort in, the fact is that he is just shit. I'm not going to hold back, Gall is a pile of absolute toss and I really can't wait until he sods of back to Carlisle in January.

Infact, Jackson's loan signings have generally been a load of crap. Lee Ridley had the turning circle and speed of the Titanic avoiding icebergs, Adam Smith never got a look in and I feel I've let you all know what I think of Gall. Infact, regarding Adam Smith, what made Peter think that a player who didn't get a look in at a League Two club would be a worthy punt to take on loan? His permanent signings haven't exactly been great....then again, half of them never play so what was the point in bringing them in?

Jackson clearly believes in his own hype, but it's a pity that his hype doesn't quite match reality. We are not, nor have we ever been the envy of League Two. You go on about it being a level playing field now that Peterborough and MK Dons are going....I must have forgot that there were only ever two promotion places, god forbid if we ever finished third or, have the cheek to sneak into the Playoffs. I mean, there was never any chance of doing anything last season because Peterborough and MK Dons were in the division.....what a defeatist attitude.

I don't think that Jackson has earned a new contract at all. We're pretty much in exactly the same situation that we were in last season, looking mediocrity in the fact...and don't let the fact that we're only five points off of the Playoffs fool you. Let's look at the wins we have had. We've beaten Barnet, Chester and Macclesfield, not exactly three teams that will ever appear in the "Who's who" of great footballing teams. We were lucky to win at Bournemouth.....no, it wasn't a good performance, we were just lucky that the referee disallowed goals that they deserved. Gillingham and Chesterfield were also god awful, so in short, we haven't actually beat anyone good.

I'm happy to be proved wrong and Jackson guide us to promotion, but playing his tactics and the team that he insists on playing will see us go no-where.

View a Printer Friendly version of this Story.

Bookmark or share this story with:

Does Jackson actually deserve a new contract?
Posted by: theimps.tk (IP Logged)
Date: 19/11/2008 15:00

Does Jackson actually deserve a new contract?

Re: Does Jackson actually deserve a new contract?
Posted by: skeggyimp (IP Logged)
Date: 19/11/2008 16:51

Got to agree with a lot of that Nathan, it may be just that we've had an embarressing deafeat, but it seems over the last 5 or 6 six years whenever we have a must win match we to lose it.
Jacko seemed very down but didn't come up with any ideas of what he's going to do about it .
He did say they were looking for the money from a cup run to finance new players. I wonder how keen the players are to do well when they know it could be them that's replaced?

Re: Does Jackson actually deserve a new contract?
Posted by: keith47424 - Hinckley Imp (IP Logged)
Date: 19/11/2008 17:18

Lets just admit it. We support a shite team. No ifs or buts.
Like I said yesterday I am going to stop supporting the Imps and will be going out and buying a Manure strip instead. Come on the Manure.

Cheers Keith47424 - Hinckley Imp
http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c250/keith47424/lincolnsig.gif
theimps.tk Best Newcomer award winner 2007-2008 season.

Re: Does Jackson actually deserve a new contract?
Posted by: bobnudd (IP Logged)
Date: 19/11/2008 19:48

angry smileyI don't think he does. He has raised the profile of the club, debatable as I think he is trying to raise his own profile for another job after he fails in this one(Sm9)

How he calls it and I quote 'my club' is wrong as if I am not mistaken it is a community clubconfused smiley

If he comes out in the Echo tomorrow and admits he is getting it wrong at the moment then fair enough, but he won't be instantly forgiven as he has opened his trap once too often and stuck his size 8's or whatever size he is in iteye rolling smiley

Open your eyes Jacko the world doesn't revolve around you and the sun definately doesn't shine out of your @rseangry smiley

Re: Does Jackson actually deserve a new contract?
Posted by: rottweiler (IP Logged)
Date: 20/11/2008 13:00

Yes, Jackson deserves a new contract.
Simply, the Board has or hasn't faith in him, and by offering the contract, they do.
The club's profile, for whatever the reason has been raised and we either have or haven't faith that the Directors & Jackson can deliver.
Maybe stupid, but I have that faith.
I have been supporting the club for years, suffering all of the ups and downs every year, but keep coming back for more and will continue to do so.
The minute things start to wobble everybody becomes negative, surely we have to be positive to achieve things, and Jackson can and does deliver that confidence.
Let's be supporters as opposed to constantly delivering negatives.

Goto Thread: PreviousNext
Goto: Forum ListMessage ListLog In

SPORTS SPREAD BETTING

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment. We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals. We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards. If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing abuse@sportnetwork.net